Hi Sophia and Julio -

I called and left a message for Julio last night, then talked to him today. He said that the two of you are forming a group with two more people. I'm hoping that we can get the team back together (including me). I couldn't make it to the last class, because of the Jewish Holiday.

I did get a note back from Kamran and he is willing to be our "client". (See below) I'll volunteer to be the client contact, unless someone else wants to.

Julio said that our professor wanted a hard copy of our final deliverable. I will bring a hard copy to the Thurs. Class. I can send out the final copy of our project by email later today.

If the two new team members are ready to go - I can send them a copy of the final project from last term. Julio said that you had their email addresses, Sophia. Can you send those along to me?

I don't know about you to, but I feel that Spring Break was too short.

Take care,

Adam

Here is my address to mail the stuff to:

XXX

XXX

XXX

Thanks.

Also, you can call me anytime, if you do decide to use

our project for IS422.

My new phone numbers are:

(H) 630.665.3009

(W) 847.969.3648

Good Luck.

_______ My (Adam) original email_______________

> I hope all of you had a good Spring Break. I hope

> all of you did well on the

> final - Did you see your grades yet? I didn't see

> them on the Class Web site,

> so I sent Ed an email last night.

>

> For all of you: Please send me your address and I

> will mail a copy of:

>

> 1.the final deliverable with Ed's comments

> 2. the comment sheets that people made during our

> presentation.

>

>

> For Kamran, I know that you're not heading back to

> class. I hope your new house

> is working out well.

>

> I'd like to keep going with the project that we

> worked on in IS421. Sophia and

> Julio- Are you both taking IS422 on Thurs. Nights?

> If so, Do you want to

> continue with the project that we were working on

and

> continue as a team?

>

> Kamran - Will you be our 'client' and let us put

the

> design phases for Zurich

> Kemper?

>

> I looked at the Sylabus from last term that Prof.

> Mittleman used ( he's

> teaching this term too.) It looks like we would

just

> continue into the design

> phase of the project that we were working on.

>

> The reason that I'm trying to get started on this is

> that I won't be in class on

> this Thurs 4/1. It's a big Jewish Holiday and I'll

> be eating a big dinner.

>

> Sophia and Julio- if each of you could let me know

> what your plans are, I'd

> appreciate it. If you go to class on Thurs., can

you

> let me know what happens

> and include me in on a group (if we all decide to

> work on this together. ) I've

> already sent an email to Prof. Mittleman, so I'll

let

> you know if he sends me an

> advance sylabus.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Adam

>

> *******************Internet Email Confidentiality

> Footer*******************

> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained

> in this message. If you are

> not the addressee indicated in this message (or

> responsible for delivery of the

> message to such person), you may not copy or deliver

> this message to anyone. In

> such case, you should destroy this message, and

> notify us immediately. If you or

> your employer does not consent to Internet email

> messages of this kind, please

> advise us immediately. Opinions, conclusions and

> other information expressed in

> this message are not given or endorsed by my firm or

> employer unless otherwise

> indicated by an authorized representative

independent

> of this message.

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Juan [email protected]

zeeshan [email protected]

From: <[email protected]> AT INTERNET on 04/06/99 02:22 PM

To: Sophia Clay/IL/CDN, [email protected] AT INTERNET@ccmail

cc: [email protected] AT INTERNET@ccmail

Subject: My Address and Yes.

Arthur Andersen

________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________

To: [email protected], [email protected]

cc: [email protected]

Date: 04/06/99 01:31:40 PM

From: Adam Oxer, Chicago.225N

________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________

Hi Sophia and Julio -

I called and left a message for Julio last night, then talked to him today. He

said that the two of you are forming a group with two more people. I'm hoping

that we can get the team back together (including me). I couldn't make it to

the last class, because of the Jewish Holiday.

I did get a note back from Kamran and he is willing to be our "client". (See

below) I'll volunteer to be the client contact, unless someone else wants to.

Julio said that our professor wanted a hard copy of our final deliverable. I

will bring a hard copy to the Thurs. Class. I can send out the final copy of

our project by email later today.

If the two new team members are ready to go - I can send them a copy of the

final project from last term. Julio said that you had their email addresses,

Sophia. Can you send those along to me?

I don't know about you to, but I feel that Spring Break was too short.

Take care,

Adam

---------------------- Forwarded by Adam Oxer on 04/06/99 01:34 PM

---------------------------

To: Adam Oxer

cc:

Date: 03/30/99 01:52 PM

From: [email protected]

Subject: My Address and Yes.

Here is my address to mail the stuff to:

XXX

XXX

XXX

Thanks.

Also, you can call me anytime, if you do decide to use

our project for IS422.

My new phone numbers are:

(H) 630.665.3009

(W) 847.969.3648

Good Luck.

_______ My (Adam) original email_______________

> I hope all of you had a good Spring Break. I hope

> all of you did well on the

> final - Did you see your grades yet? I didn't see

> them on the Class Web site,

> so I sent Ed an email last night.

>

> For all of you: Please send me your address and I

> will mail a copy of:

>

> 1.the final deliverable with Ed's comments

> 2. the comment sheets that people made during our

> presentation.

>

>

> For Kamran, I know that you're not heading back to

> class. I hope your new house

> is working out well.

>

> I'd like to keep going with the project that we

> worked on in IS421. Sophia and

> Julio- Are you both taking IS422 on Thurs. Nights?

> If so, Do you want to

> continue with the project that we were working on

and

> continue as a team?

>

> Kamran - Will you be our 'client' and let us put

the

> design phases for Zurich

> Kemper?

>

> I looked at the Sylabus from last term that Prof.

> Mittleman used ( he's

> teaching this term too.) It looks like we would

just

> continue into the design

> phase of the project that we were working on.

>

> The reason that I'm trying to get started on this is

> that I won't be in class on

> this Thurs 4/1. It's a big Jewish Holiday and I'll

> be eating a big dinner.

>

> Sophia and Julio- if each of you could let me know

> what your plans are, I'd

> appreciate it. If you go to class on Thurs., can

you

> let me know what happens

> and include me in on a group (if we all decide to

> work on this together. ) I've

> already sent an email to Prof. Mittleman, so I'll

let

> you know if he sends me an

> advance sylabus.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Adam

>

> *******************Internet Email Confidentiality

> Footer*******************

> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained

> in this message. If you are

> not the addressee indicated in this message (or

> responsible for delivery of the

> message to such person), you may not copy or deliver

> this message to anyone. In

> such case, you should destroy this message, and

> notify us immediately. If you or

> your employer does not consent to Internet email

> messages of this kind, please

> advise us immediately. Opinions, conclusions and

> other information expressed in

> this message are not given or endorsed by my firm or

> employer unless otherwise

> indicated by an authorized representative

independent

> of this message.

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are

not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the

message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In

such case, you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately. If you or

your employer does not consent to Internet email messages of this kind, please

advise us immediately. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in

this message are not given or endorsed by my firm or employer unless otherwise

indicated by an authorized representative independent of this message.

[rcf822.txt]

From: <[email protected]> AT INTERNET on 04/06/99 04:53 PM

To: Sophia Clay/IL/CDN, [email protected] AT INTERNET@ccmail,

[email protected] AT INTERNET@ccmail

cc:

Subject: Final Documents - 2 (.doc)

Arthur Andersen

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

cc:

Date: 04/06/99 04:49:16 PM

From: Adam Oxer, Chicago.225N

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

This was the final draft that we submitted on 3/4/99.

Adam

---------------------- Forwarded by Adam Oxer on 04/06/99 04:51 PM

---------------------------

To: [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected]

cc:

Date: 03/04/99 10:58 AM

From: Adam Oxer, Chicago.225N

Subject: Final Documents - 2 (.doc)

This is the final copy that I printed out. I'm printing the final copy to

turn in and Julio is printing a copy for each of us.

Please look at it and let me know if you have anything that needs to be

changed - 37 pages of fun between the two document - The first one is p.

1-32, the second is p.33-37.

Thanks,

Adam

The two documents are below:

(See attached file: DeliverableFFinal.doc)

(See attached file: TechMatrix.doc)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this

message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message, and

notify us immediately. If you or your employer does not consent to Internet

email messages of this kind, please advise us immediately. Opinions,

conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given

or endorsed by my firm or employer unless otherwise indicated by an

authorized representative independent of this message.

[deliverableffinal.doc]

[techmatrix.doc]

[rcf822.txt]

Can someone fill me in on where we're at with this project?

Any new developments, team meetings, project cancelled?

I'm here until 4:00 pm.

Thanks.

Sophia Clay

312-732-2648

Yes. After class is fine.

d

-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

Sent: 4/14/99 5:01 PM

Please let me know if our team can meet with you after class, thursday,

4/15/99

Thanks,

Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality

Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you are

not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery

of the

message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone. In

such case, you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately.

If you or

your employer does not consent to Internet email messages of this kind,

please

advise us immediately. Opinions, conclusions and other information

expressed in

this message are not given or endorsed by my firm or employer unless

otherwise

indicated by an authorized representative independent of this message.

We have a meeting planned with Danny. See you all in class and see below for his confirmation.

Adam

Yes. After class is fine.

d

-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

Sent: 4/14/99 5:01 PM

Please let me know if our team can meet with you after class, thursday,

4/15/99

Thanks,

Adam

We met with you after class this past Thursday and would like to schedule meetings with you for the rest of the term. Is it possible to plan a meeting with you at 5:15 for the following Thursdays before class? I realize these are during your open office hours, but I thought it would be good to request these days.

This Thurs. 4/22/99

5/06/99

5/20/99

Our team met this past Saturday and developed a Gantt Chart that we would like to show you. I will bring it on Thursday.

Thank you,

Adam

Hi Adam,

I was wondering if we were on to meet with the professor this

afternoon before class.

Can you please update me on that before two o'clock this afternoon.

Thanks,

Juan

I didn't hear back from Dannny, but since 5:15pm is within his regular office hours (4-5:30), I'll say we're OK. I will send him an e-mail to confirm, but lets plan to meet at his office at 5:15. His office is CST641. His tel. # is 312- 362-6103 in case he needs to let us into the area for offices on the 6th floor.

Thanks,

Adam

P.S. I could not get the Project 98 document into the "Electronic Doc" format that Sophia suggested. I don't think I have those capabilities. Below is the document, though. I will bring a hard copy to the meeting and class for everyone.

[supportp1042199.mpp]

Hi Adam,

I was wondering if we were on to meet with the professor this

afternoon before class.

Can you please update me on that before two o'clock this afternoon.

Thanks,

Juan

I sent an e-mail earlier in the week. I just wanted to confirm that our team (SupportP1 Project) can meet with you during your office hours today at 5:15pm. Please let me know if this is fine.

Thank you,

Adam

At 01:35 PM 4/22/1999 , you wrote:

>

>

>I sent an e-mail earlier in the week. I just wanted to confirm that our team

>(SupportP1 Project) can meet with you during your office hours today at

5:15pm.

>Please let me know if this is fine.

Zeeshan said 5:20. Either is fine with me. I will need to leave for class

at 5:35 or so.

dm

______________________________

Daniel Mittleman

DePaul University

http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

Hello from the Northeast side of the Loop:

A few issues that I wanted to discuss:

1. Our 4/22 meeting with Danny was attended by Juan and Adam.

Danny said that our project plan looks good, but suggested that we add more detail for each line listed in our MS. Project 98 Gantt Chart. This way we can break down the time ( 3-4 weeks) better and show ‘milemarkers’ as we move along with the project. With this in mind, I want to suggest that each of us look at the attached file and expand on our part of the project.

For example, I have end-user help design and end-user help coding. I would add the detailed tasks for each of these areas that I need to complete. I would also add dates along the way that I would have deliverables for someone in the group to look at.

The other issue that Danny brought up was in regards to our discussion about allowing team members to learn about the whole project or at least other parts of the project that they are not directly responsible for.

He suggested that we make a new column in our project plan. This would be for the critic of each task. The critic is the person that needs to understand what the person responsible for the task is doing. The person responsible explains their task to the critic and the critic gives their input ( hence, the name critic). Let me know what each of you think about this idea. I guess we could pick and choose which tasks would have a critic for.

2. As you can see in the attached project plan, we do have a meeting scheduled at 5:15 on the 8th floor of the DePaul Center. Can we meet outside of our classroom, in the open area with seating? Let me know.

3. Julio – I looked at the E.R. Diagram from deliverable C & D from last term. It looks like we didn’t do that great of a job normalizing the data.

Here is my suggestion for our entities:

Request ID (PK) Employee ID(PK) Priority ID (PK) Application ID (PK)

Requester Emp ID(FK) Employee Name Priority Desc. Application Desc.

Assigned To Emp ID(FK) Employee Title Priority Resp. Time

Assigned By Emp ID(FK) Employee Position

Priority ID(FK)

Application ID(FK)

If any of you have suggestions regarding this look for the entities, let me know.

Thanks,

Adam

Hello from the Northeast side of the Loop:

A few issues that I wanted to discuss:

1. Our 4/22 meeting with Danny was attended by Juan and Adam.

Danny said that our project plan looks good, but suggested that we add more detail for each line listed in our MS. Project 98 Gantt Chart. This way we can break down the time ( 3-4 weeks) better and show ‘milemarkers’ as we move along with the project. With this in mind, I want to suggest that each of us look at the attached file and expand on our part of the project.

For example, I have end-user help design and end-user help coding. I would add the detailed tasks for each of these areas that I need to complete. I would also add dates along the way that I would have deliverables for someone in the group to look at.

The other issue that Danny brought up was in regards to our discussion about allowing team members to learn about the whole project or at least other parts of the project that they are not directly responsible for.

He suggested that we make a new column in our project plan. This would be for the critic of each task. The critic is the person that needs to understand what the person responsible for the task is doing. The person responsible explains their task to the critic and the critic gives their input ( hence, the name critic). Let me know what each of you think about this idea. I guess we could pick and choose which tasks would have a critic for.

2. As you can see in the attached project plan, we do have a meeting scheduled at 5:15 on the 8th floor of the DePaul Center. Can we meet outside of our classroom, in the open area with seating? Let me know.

3. Julio – I looked at the E.R. Diagram from deliverable C & D from last term. It looks like we didn’t do that great of a job normalizing the data.

Here is my suggestion for our entities:

Request ID (PK) Employee ID(PK) Priority ID (PK) Application ID (PK)

Requester Emp ID(FK) Employee Name Priority Desc. Application Desc.

Assigned To Emp ID(FK) Employee Title Priority Resp. Time

Assigned By Emp ID(FK) Employee Position

Priority ID(FK)

Application ID(FK)

If any of you have suggestions regarding this look for the entities, let me know.

Thanks,

Adam

[projplan042799.doc]

We had a 5:15pm scheduled meeting today. I just want to confirm that everyone will be there. Please let me know if you can't make it. (8th floor, DePaul Center, in the chairs in front of our classroom)

Thanks,

Adam

I will be there but I'm running a little bit behind, so i may be a few

minutes late (5:20 or 5:25).

Sophia

[email protected] on 04/29/99 03:55:16 PM

To: [email protected], Sophia Clay/IL/CDN, [email protected],

[email protected]

cc:

Subject: 5:15 Meeting Today (4/29)

We had a 5:15pm scheduled meeting today. I just want to confirm that

everyone

will be there. Please let me know if you can't make it. (8th floor,

DePaul

Center, in the chairs in front of our classroom)

Thanks,

Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

Hi Juan.

Here is the file which contains the database.

and the other one contains the ERD

Let me know if you can open it.

Tomorrow, I am going to give you a hard copy.

see you tomorrow

Thanks

Julio

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

[support1.mdb]

[support1.er1]

Juan,

I have attached the mdb file which contains the database.

Let me know if you need something else

Thanks Julio

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

[support1.mdb]

The Web site looks fine for a start. I know you have a Midterm this

week, but we have a meeting with Danny on Thurs. 5/6 in his office at

5:15pm. We need to show him that we've got a repository by then. Can

get all our information to date into the Web site? Please let me know if

you need help.

I will tell you more about the meeting we had on Saturday. It went

pretty well.

Thanks,

Adam

Info for the team:

The Web site address-

http://campus.fortunecity.com/bethel/464

I just wanted to confirm the meeting that we (Support P1 Project) scheduled with you for this Thurs. 5/6 at 5:15pm in your office. Please confirm that this is fine.

We originally requested this meeting in a 4/20 e-mail to you.

Thanks,

Adam

At 05:43 PM 5/4/1999 , you wrote:

>

>

>I just wanted to confirm the meeting that we (Support P1 Project) scheduled

>with

>you for this Thurs. 5/6 at 5:15pm in your office. Please confirm that this is

>fine.

Thanks for confirming; it wasn't in my book. See you there.

______________________________

Daniel Mittleman

DePaul University

http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

Here's what Danny sent back.

Adam

At 05:43 PM 5/4/1999 , you wrote:

>

>

>I just wanted to confirm the meeting that we (Support P1 Project) scheduled

>with

>you for this Thurs. 5/6 at 5:15pm in your office. Please confirm that this is

>fine.

Thanks for confirming; it wasn't in my book. See you there.

______________________________

Daniel Mittleman

DePaul University

http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

Hi,

where are we meeting him tomorrow in his office I will be in lab on 4 floor

of CTI if you want to drop by then we can go up togeather

Thanks

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

Subject: Re: SupportP1 Project 5:15pm Meeting Scheduled 5/6/99

Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 08:48:10 -0600

Here's what Danny sent back.

Adam

---------------------- Forwarded by Adam Oxer on 05/05/99 08:48 AM

---------------------------

To: Adam Oxer

cc:

Date: 05/04/99 05:24 PM

From: [email protected]

Subject: Re: SupportP1 Project 5:15pm Meeting Scheduled 5/6/99

At 05:43 PM 5/4/1999 , you wrote:

>

>

>I just wanted to confirm the meeting that we (Support P1 Project)

scheduled

>with

>you for this Thurs. 5/6 at 5:15pm in your office. Please confirm that

this is

>fine.

Thanks for confirming; it wasn't in my book. See you there.

______________________________

Daniel Mittleman

DePaul University

http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery

of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

Ok, here is where I am at.

I took the database file home and got a chance to work on it yesterday.

I build the two forms that we had agreed on, but then I lost the file(s) all

together.

I assumed that it might be a virus that my computer might be carrying - I

then started up Norton Anti Virus and no Viruses were detected.

This morning, I decided to try and open the database directly from Julio's

e-mail.

Well, it turns out that my PC won't open the file because it has detected

some form of a virus.

I wanted to ask you guys whether you had the same problems opening the file

or not.

On another note,

Some thoughts on the interface forms....

After having worked on it yesterday, there were some things that I thought

needed to be considered.....

1. Since the form for the request is going to generate an automatic

Request ID when the form is loaded....this form can be used later for other

purposes.

2. A second form must be produced to do a search by the same "Request

ID".....and therefore it cannot be the same form.

3. I also think that for each process and the form used in that stage, we

need to really re-evaluate what fields are really necessary....because it

seems kind of redundant to see the same form...

4. I think that we can design a better prototype if we can all get

together again and discuss these issues with a little more effort.

5. I know that at this time we are not going to have any forms to

present to Dr. Middleman, but I think we should approach him with these

issues with him.

Maybe after we discuss these things with him, I will get a better

sense of what is best to do. I can then make an appointment myself to meet

with him alone or in group which ever you guys feels more comfortable with,

and then take it from there.

Let me know what you think...

Hey I just finished trying another way of loading the file onto ACCESS 97

and it worked...

I will go ahead and make the forms that we agreed...and then some if

necessary...

Sorry, didn't mean to have you guys get scared/worried...

See you later this afternoon.

Sounds good that you got into that file. I will try to comment on your last e-mail during the day today. If not we will talk about it at the meeting at 5:15. See you there.

Adam

Hey I just finished trying another way of loading the file onto ACCESS 97

and it worked...

I will go ahead and make the forms that we agreed...and then some if

necessary...

Sorry, didn't mean to have you guys get scared/worried...

See you later this afternoon.

I may not be able to attend tonight's 5:15 meeting or class session.

If i am not there by 5:15 start without me.

Sophia -

Zeeshan is available tomorrow (Sat.) at 10:00am, rather than 9:00am. The four of us decided that we should meet then, rather than meet without him. Is this alright with you?

Please let me know if this is alright with you. The plan is to meet at DePaul Center on the 11th floor ( in the open area), then go find a conf. room in the library on the 10th.

The four of us met with Danny for a few minutes at about 5:20 yesterday before class. Julio showed him the ER Diagram, which Danny had a few questions about. He also showed Danny the detailed database schema report from access, but Danny didn't have time to look at it. Juan showed him some prelim. screen prototypes. By then, it was time to get to class.

We got a homework assignment in class that's due next Thurs. I got a copy of it for you.

-Adam

Sophia -

Zeeshan is available tomorrow (Sat.) at 10:00am, rather than 9:00am. The four of us decided that we should meet then, rather than meet without him. Is this alright with you?

Please let me know if this is alright with you. The plan is to meet at DePaul Center on the 11th floor ( in the open area), then go find a conf. room in the library on the 10th.

The four of us met with Danny for a few minutes at about 5:20 yesterday before class. Julio showed him the ER Diagram, which Danny had a few questions about. He also showed Danny the detailed database schema report from access, but Danny didn't have time to look at it. Juan showed him some prelim. screen prototypes. By then, it was time to get to class.

We got a homework assignment in class that's due next Thurs. I got a copy of it for you.

-Adam

I was thinking a little bit after class yesterday.

Here are some ideas on Print Jobs...Tasks...for the system..

Think about them and be ready to discuss them at tomorrows meeting..

1. Report/Statement that is e-mailed to the client.

2. The lead technician will probably want to get a daily report on

tasks that are still Open

* Report based on days open.

* Report based on unresolved cases

* Report on who are the technicians doing the work, maybe some do more

than other. Or just simply to keep track of a technicians progress.

* Report on the type of system/computer that tends to break down more

frequently.

* Report (maybe) clients who tend to call for every little problem.

(sorry- Email)

* Report on the time that lapses from the time the e-mail comes in to

the time it gets resolved.---along with the particular system associated

with it.

Well that is it for now.

See you guys tomorrow.

Fine with me. But i can't stay pass 11:45 or noon. As I mentioned

last time my IS483 standing team meetings are on Saturdays from

1:00pm - 3:00pm.

Sophia

[email protected] on 05/07/99 10:00:36 AM

To: [email protected], Sophia Clay/IL/CDN, [email protected],

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

cc:

Subject: Sat. AM 10:00 - OK?

Sophia -

Zeeshan is available tomorrow (Sat.) at 10:00am, rather than 9:00am. The

four

of us decided that we should meet then, rather than meet without him. Is

this

alright with you?

Please let me know if this is alright with you. The plan is to meet at

DePaul

Center on the 11th floor ( in the open area), then go find a conf. room in

the

library on the 10th.

The four of us met with Danny for a few minutes at about 5:20 yesterday

before

class. Julio showed him the ER Diagram, which Danny had a few questions

about.

He also showed Danny the detailed database schema report from access, but

Danny

didn't have time to look at it. Juan showed him some prelim. screen

prototypes.

By then, it was time to get to class.

We got a homework assignment in class that's due next Thurs. I got a copy

of it

for you.

-Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

We'll See you there.

Here is the latest version of Project 98 that we gave a hard copy to Danny. I'll give you a hard copy tomorrow.

[supportp105699.mpp]

Fine with me. But i can't stay pass 11:45 or noon. As I mentioned

last time my IS483 standing team meetings are on Saturdays from

1:00pm - 3:00pm.

Sophia

[email protected] on 05/07/99 10:00:36 AM

To: [email protected], Sophia Clay/IL/CDN, [email protected],

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

cc:

Subject: Sat. AM 10:00 - OK?

Sophia -

Zeeshan is available tomorrow (Sat.) at 10:00am, rather than 9:00am. The

four

of us decided that we should meet then, rather than meet without him. Is

this

alright with you?

Please let me know if this is alright with you. The plan is to meet at

DePaul

Center on the 11th floor ( in the open area), then go find a conf. room in

the

library on the 10th.

The four of us met with Danny for a few minutes at about 5:20 yesterday

before

class. Julio showed him the ER Diagram, which Danny had a few questions

about.

He also showed Danny the detailed database schema report from access, but

Danny

didn't have time to look at it. Juan showed him some prelim. screen

prototypes.

By then, it was time to get to class.

We got a homework assignment in class that's due next Thurs. I got a copy

of it

for you.

-Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

We'll See you there.

Here is the latest version of Project 98 that we gave a hard copy to Danny. I'll give you a hard copy tomorrow.

[supportp1050699.mpp]

Fine with me. But i can't stay pass 11:45 or noon. As I mentioned

last time my IS483 standing team meetings are on Saturdays from

1:00pm - 3:00pm.

Sophia

[email protected] on 05/07/99 10:00:36 AM

To: [email protected], Sophia Clay/IL/CDN, [email protected],

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

cc:

Subject: Sat. AM 10:00 - OK?

Sophia -

Zeeshan is available tomorrow (Sat.) at 10:00am, rather than 9:00am. The

four

of us decided that we should meet then, rather than meet without him. Is

this

alright with you?

Please let me know if this is alright with you. The plan is to meet at

DePaul

Center on the 11th floor ( in the open area), then go find a conf. room in

the

library on the 10th.

The four of us met with Danny for a few minutes at about 5:20 yesterday

before

class. Julio showed him the ER Diagram, which Danny had a few questions

about.

He also showed Danny the detailed database schema report from access, but

Danny

didn't have time to look at it. Juan showed him some prelim. screen

prototypes.

By then, it was time to get to class.

We got a homework assignment in class that's due next Thurs. I got a copy

of it

for you.

-Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

Hi Juan,

I have attached the final database schema (mdb file)for our project.

Please note that I have put the relationships among the tables. You can

see these relationships if you go in the main menu TOOLS and then

RELATIONSHIPS.

If you have any questions let me know.

Thanks Julio

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

[support1.mdb]

<<support1.mdb>>

Ok..guys..here is the general idea of how the forms will look.

There are three forms currently...

Request is the Initial one..

Then the Assign/priority form will be the form used to prioritize, assign,

and close the job.

The third form will be to look up technician info...

Now the idea for the second and third process will be that both the Tech

lead and the Technician will be using the same form but with different

privileges.

Thanks,

Juan..

[support1.mdb]

Julio,

Do you have access97? if so, it's possible to create multiple prim keys in

one table:

1) Delete relationship between REQUEST.request_id and

ASSIGNED_REQUEST.request_id

2) Go to table design

a) select ASSIGNED_REQUEST table

b.) select rows request_id and employee_id

c.) select primary key

d.) change request ID to "Long Integer" (same as

REQUEST.request_ID)

3) Go to relationships and re-add relationship REQUEST.request_id

and ASSIGNED_REQUEST.request_id.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sophia

[email protected]

Julio Salazar <[email protected]> on 05/08/99 01:42:12 PM

To: Juan Casillas <[email protected]>

cc: Juan Casillas <[email protected]>, Sophia Clay/IL/CDN, Zeeshan

Khan <[email protected]>, Adam Oxer

<[email protected]>, Julio Salazar <[email protected]>,

Julio A Salazar <[email protected]>

Subject: Final Database Schema support1

Hi Juan,

I have attached the final database schema (mdb file)for our project.

Please note that I have put the relationships among the tables. You can

see these relationships if you go in the main menu TOOLS and then

RELATIONSHIPS.

If you have any questions let me know.

Thanks Julio

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

[support1.mdb]

Hi Adam,

can u email me the project documents that we have completed so far

deliverable A

Project plan with gantt chart

last quarter deliverable

I think these are the dues so far that we can post on the web

thanks

Zeeshan

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

HI,

I could not open the file as they have not MS project at school if u have

the CD of the application or u can email me in HTML format then I can post

it on the web

THnkas

And email me the other two deliverables too

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 17:11:31 -0600

---------------------- Forwarded by Adam Oxer on 05/12/99 05:12 PM

---------------------------

To: [email protected]

cc: [email protected], [email protected], Adam Oxer,

[email protected],

[email protected]

Date: 05/07/99 04:11 PM

From: Adam Oxer, Chicago.225N, 50 / 70-ATS

Subject: Re: Sat. AM 10:00 - OK?

We'll See you there.

Here is the latest version of Project 98 that we gave a hard copy to Danny.

I'll give you a hard copy tomorrow.

(See attached file: SupportP1050699.mpp)

To: Adam Oxer

cc: [email protected], [email protected], Adam Oxer,

[email protected],

[email protected]

Date: 05/07/99 08:32 AM

From: [email protected]

Subject: Re: Sat. AM 10:00 - OK?

Fine with me. But i can't stay pass 11:45 or noon. As I mentioned

last time my IS483 standing team meetings are on Saturdays from

1:00pm - 3:00pm.

Sophia

[email protected] on 05/07/99 10:00:36 AM

To: [email protected], Sophia Clay/IL/CDN, [email protected],

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

cc:

Subject: Sat. AM 10:00 - OK?

Sophia -

Zeeshan is available tomorrow (Sat.) at 10:00am, rather than 9:00am. The

four

of us decided that we should meet then, rather than meet without him. Is

this

alright with you?

Please let me know if this is alright with you. The plan is to meet at

DePaul

Center on the 11th floor ( in the open area), then go find a conf. room in

the

library on the 10th.

The four of us met with Danny for a few minutes at about 5:20 yesterday

before

class. Julio showed him the ER Diagram, which Danny had a few questions

about.

He also showed Danny the detailed database schema report from access, but

Danny

didn't have time to look at it. Juan showed him some prelim. screen

prototypes.

By then, it was time to get to class.

We got a homework assignment in class that's due next Thurs. I got a copy

of it

for you.

-Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery

of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

<< SupportP1050699.mpp >>

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

We talked about meeting with our team ( SupportP1 - Software changes for Peoplesoft projects) Tomorrow, Sat. 5/15. Can we meet at 9:30 at Starbucks on Jackson and Wabash? We'd like about 30 - 40 minutes of your time.

Thanks,

Adam

This note is mostly for Sophia - We talked meeting at 9:00 am on Sat - to talk about the project before we meet with Danny at 9:30. Danny said in class that a 9:30 meeting was OK. He just wanted a confirmation by E-mail.

Is meeting at 9:00am OK with all of you? Also at Starbucks

Thanks,

Adam

We talked about meeting with our team ( SupportP1 - Software changes for Peoplesoft projects) Tomorrow, Sat. 5/15. Can we meet at 9:30 at Starbucks on Jackson and Wabash? We'd like about 30 - 40 minutes of your time.

Thanks,

Adam

Fine with me.

Sophia

[email protected] on 05/14/99 09:08:32 AM

To: [email protected], Sophia Clay/IL/CDN@CDN, [email protected],

[email protected]

cc:

Subject: Our Meeting before the meeting w/ Danny: Sat. AM Meeting 9:00am@

Starbucks ( Jackson & Wabash) - Please confirm

This note is mostly for Sophia - We talked meeting at 9:00 am on Sat - to

talk

about the project before we meet with Danny at 9:30. Danny said in class

that a

9:30 meeting was OK. He just wanted a confirmation by E-mail.

Is meeting at 9:00am OK with all of you? Also at Starbucks

Thanks,

Adam

---------------------- Forwarded by Adam Oxer on 05/14/99 08:04 AM

---------------------------

To: [email protected]

cc: [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected]

Date: 05/14/99 08:00 AM

From: Adam Oxer, Chicago.225N, 50 / 70-ATS

Subject: Sat. AM Meeting 9:30am@ Starbucks ( Jackson & Wabash) - Please

confirm

We talked about meeting with our team ( SupportP1 - Software changes for

Peoplesoft projects) Tomorrow, Sat. 5/15. Can we meet at 9:30 at Starbucks

on

Jackson and Wabash? We'd like about 30 - 40 minutes of your time.

Thanks,

Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

(See attached file: DFD.doc)

[dfd.doc]

My apologies. I realized late last night that I double booked tomorrow

morning. I already have a meeting scheduled from 9:30 to Noon off campus

tomorrow. Might it be possible for me to meet with your team early

afternoon? 12:30 would be perfect for me. I can handle noon through 4:00

any time within. I will be working in my office tomorrow afternoon.

Starbucks meeting place works for me.

Again, sorry for complicating your schedules.

danny

At 09:00 AM 5/14/1999 , [email protected] wrote:

>

>

>We talked about meeting with our team ( SupportP1 - Software changes for

>Peoplesoft projects) Tomorrow, Sat. 5/15. Can we meet at 9:30 at Starbucks on

>Jackson and Wabash? We'd like about 30 - 40 minutes of your time.

>

>Thanks,

>

>Adam

>

>*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

>

>

>Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you

>are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of

>the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

>anyone.

>In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by

>reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

>to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other

>information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my

>firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

>

______________________________

Daniel Mittleman

DePaul University

http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

Hi All,

since danny will not be able to meet us before 12.30 do u guys still want to

meet at 9 tomorrow ....I think we should meet a bit late by 11am or so ....I

dont think we need a six hour meeting

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

Subject: Our Meeting before the meeting w/ Danny: Sat. AM Meeting 9:00am@

Starbucks ( Jackson & Wabash) - Please confirm

Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 08:08:32 -0600

This note is mostly for Sophia - We talked meeting at 9:00 am on Sat - to

talk

about the project before we meet with Danny at 9:30. Danny said in class

that a

9:30 meeting was OK. He just wanted a confirmation by E-mail.

Is meeting at 9:00am OK with all of you? Also at Starbucks

Thanks,

Adam

---------------------- Forwarded by Adam Oxer on 05/14/99 08:04 AM

---------------------------

To: [email protected]

cc: [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected]

Date: 05/14/99 08:00 AM

From: Adam Oxer, Chicago.225N, 50 / 70-ATS

Subject: Sat. AM Meeting 9:30am@ Starbucks ( Jackson & Wabash) - Please

confirm

We talked about meeting with our team ( SupportP1 - Software changes for

Peoplesoft projects) Tomorrow, Sat. 5/15. Can we meet at 9:30 at Starbucks

on

Jackson and Wabash? We'd like about 30 - 40 minutes of your time.

Thanks,

Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery

of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

I didn't hear back from any of you yesterday afternoon. I am hopeful that

you got my message that I can't make it on Saturday morning. If you get

this email late friday or early saturday could you give me a call at home?

My number is 312-559-1998. I will probably leave the house about 8:45am.

You can call after 7:30.

dm

At 09:00 AM 5/14/1999 , you wrote:

>

>

>We talked about meeting with our team ( SupportP1 - Software changes for

>Peoplesoft projects) Tomorrow, Sat. 5/15. Can we meet at 9:30 at Starbucks on

>Jackson and Wabash? We'd like about 30 - 40 minutes of your time.

>

>Thanks,

>

>Adam

>

>*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

>

>

>Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you

>are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of

>the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

>anyone.

>In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by

>reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

>to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other

>information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my

>firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

>

______________________________

Daniel Mittleman

DePaul University

http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

Hi All,

I met Danny on sat at 1.30pm and show him the DFD and structured chart that

I and Adam had done .....he said the same thing, Adam that since in our

project processes are not dependent on each other we dont need a structured

chart and state diagram what we need is the CRUD matrix which we already

have made....but I talk to Sophia and she thinks otherwise so we have to

decide among overselves that we want to put it in our not Danny said that if

it is not meaningful to the project then dont put it in.

About DFD he said that we need to have a level 2 for that. he said that we

should show maintain process maintain employee,maintain priority and

maintain department as something like a single process on level 1 of DFD and

then break it up inthe level2 for details...I think he dont like the idea of

having 3 pages for level1 of DFD he wants o have level one of DFD on 1 page

so according to him this will give us some space to put everything on one

page...

he also wants to create a level 2 for generate report process particularly

when in technical lead we are submitting 2 reports.

he sais thah he is ok with our ERD but I am not sure which one he was

talking about as we have not show him the latest one ...

I asked him about a meeting appointment after class on thursday so that we

can show him the deliverable B before submission and wants us to make an

appointment thru email...I think we should do that fast before anyone else

pick up the slot....

My understanding is that deliverable B is worth 19 points and we will be

graded on the basis of deliverable B for that 19 points not on the part of

the deliverable B that we will submit with final version so we should take

especial care for the mistakes and dont postpone it for until for the final

submission of the report as deliverable C

I have updated the web site I put some bright orange color in the back

ground let me know about your opinions on that and also what else u want to

put on the web site.

I talked to him about the report part which is due for me he said that he is

only interested in the text format and does not require codes and interface

for the report generations...but I will reconfirm with him again .....

let me know what u guys think about structured chart

rest of the things look fine.

Zeeshan

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

Julio, Zeeshan and I met on Sat. Morning. I didn't see the note from

Danny, so I waited from 9:05 am until Julio and Zeeshan came to

Starbucks. We did get some work done and I think we are pretty close to

finishing Deliverable B, so let's just see if we can complete things by

e-mail during the beginning of the week.

Please look at the list below. The three of us looked over the

Deliverable B requirements and decided that this is what we need to turn

in. Juan and Sophia - Please let us know if this looks fine with you.

Deliverable B

Part 1 - Data Structures

1.1 ERD

(Resource: Julio - Done)

1.2 database tables

(Resource: Julio - Done)

1.3 data dictionary

(Resource: Julio - To be done this week)

( identified and typed - taken from access)

Part 2 - System Internals

2.1 Data Flow Diagram

(Resource: Sophia - Done)

2.2 Structure Charts (optional)

(Resource: Zeeshan - Started by Zeeshan and Adam, to be completed if

Danny says we need it)

Zeeshan and I worked through a structure chart for our project. It

seemed to be of little benefit because our project is very event

driven.

Zeeshan was going to try to see Danny on Sat. at 12:30pm and ask him if

he thought we needed to include this. Zeeshan- Did you get to meet

Danny and what did he say?

2.3 Flow Charts

(Not Needed)

Because this project is more event-driven, we decided on Sat. AM that

they were not needed and not appropriate. Juan and Sophia - Let me know

if you disagree.

2.4 State Diagram

( Resource: To be determined)

This seems to be an appropriate exercise and something to include in the

deliverable. I saw the description of it on p. 497 in the text. I know

we talked about this last Sat., I think we should try to complete this

to put in Deliverable B. Does anyone want to volunteer to give this a

try? Sophia, can you give someone some direction on how to do this? Or

should we just leave it out? ( I will do this if noone else wants to.)

2.5 CRUD Matrix

( Resource: Adam - To be done this week)

I put the CRUD Matrix that we completed (Last Sat.) into an Excel

Spreadsheet. It is attached below. I have to make it look better - I

will work on that before Thurs.

Part 3 - User Interface Screens

(Resource: Juan - To be done this week)

We looked at Juan's interface screens - they look good. The only

problem is that we changed the ERD and tables, so they now need to be

revised. We need to include the attributes from the latest version of

the ERD. This includes items from the "Assigned_Request" Entity and the

renamed "Process" Entity that we discussed last Saturday.

In general, it would be nice if we could hand Deliverable B to Danny on

Thursday Night. Do you all think that we could get it done by then? We

thought that it is possible when we talked on Sat. AM. But Maybe it

would be better to look at everything on Thurs. Night and make sure that

all models balance with eachother ( This was in BOLD in the deliverable

requirements).

We also discussed on Sat AM: That we could put the whole Deliverable B

on our Web site ( www.campus.fortunecity.com/bethel/464), then send

Danny an e-mail with a link to it.

I have not checked my email at work since Friday at 5:00pm. I have been

told that our outside email takes a while to get through our Arthur

Andersen Firewall. This is probably why I didn't get Danny's email.

If you sent me email over the weekend, I probably didn't see it yet, so

take that into account when reading this.

Take care,

Adam

CRUD Matrix - rough copy is attached. I will work on it.

Message-ID: <[email protected]>

Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 20:30:02 -0500

From: Blue Sedge <[email protected]>

Reply-To: [email protected]

Organization: Blue Sedge

X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-IDT-v5 (Win95; U)

MIME-Version: 1.0

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

CC: [email protected]

Subject: Wrapping up Deliverable B.

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Julio, Zeeshan and I met on Sat. Morning. I didn't see the note from

Danny, so I waited from 9:05 am until Julio and Zeeshan came to

Starbucks. We did get some work done and I think we are pretty close to

finishing Deliverable B, so let's just see if we can complete things by

e-mail during the beginning of the week.

Please look at the list below. The three of us looked over the

Deliverable B requirements and decided that this is what we need to turn

in. Juan and Sophia - Please let us know if this looks fine with you.

Deliverable B

Part 1 - Data Structures

1.1 ERD

(Resource: Julio - Done)

1.2 database tables

(Resource: Julio - Done)

1.3 data dictionary

(Resource: Julio - To be done this week)

( identified and typed - taken from access)

Part 2 - System Internals

2.1 Data Flow Diagram

(Resource: Sophia - Done)

2.2 Structure Charts (optional)

(Resource: Zeeshan - Started by Zeeshan and Adam, to be completed if

Danny says we need it)

Zeeshan and I worked through a structure chart for our project. It

seemed to be of little benefit because our project is very event

driven.

Zeeshan was going to try to see Danny on Sat. at 12:30pm and ask him if

he thought we needed to include this. Zeeshan- Did you get to meet

Danny and what did he say?

2.3 Flow Charts

(Not Needed)

Because this project is more event-driven, we decided on Sat. AM that

they were not needed and not appropriate. Juan and Sophia - Let me know

if you disagree.

2.4 State Diagram

( Resource: To be determined)

This seems to be an appropriate exercise and something to include in the

deliverable. I saw the description of it on p. 497 in the text. I know

we talked about this last Sat., I think we should try to complete this

to put in Deliverable B. Does anyone want to volunteer to give this a

try? Sophia, can you give someone some direction on how to do this? Or

should we just leave it out? ( I will do this if noone else wants to.)

2.5 CRUD Matrix

( Resource: Adam - To be done this week)

I put the CRUD Matrix that we completed (Last Sat.) into an Excel

Spreadsheet. It is attached below. I have to make it look better - I

will work on that before Thurs.

Part 3 - User Interface Screens

(Resource: Juan - To be done this week)

We looked at Juan's interface screens - they look good. The only

problem is that we changed the ERD and tables, so they now need to be

revised. We need to include the attributes from the latest version of

the ERD. This includes items from the "Assigned_Request" Entity and the

renamed "Process" Entity that we discussed last Saturday.

In general, it would be nice if we could hand Deliverable B to Danny on

Thursday Night. Do you all think that we could get it done by then? We

thought that it is possible when we talked on Sat. AM. But Maybe it

would be better to look at everything on Thurs. Night and make sure that

all models balance with eachother ( This was in BOLD in the deliverable

requirements).

We also discussed on Sat AM: That we could put the whole Deliverable B

on our Web site ( www.campus.fortunecity.com/bethel/464), then send

Danny an e-mail with a link to it.

I have not checked my email at work since Friday at 5:00pm. I have been

told that our outside email takes a while to get through our Arthur

Andersen Firewall. This is probably why I didn't get Danny's email.

If you sent me email over the weekend, I probably didn't see it yet, so

take that into account when reading this.

Take care,

Adam

[051599 crud.xls]

Hi all

Adam I had send a detailed email regarding the Sat meeting with

DAnny......again his greater empahsis was on that everything is balance and

syncroniized with each other.....I emailed u guys his comments regarding the

DFD and I think we should set a meeting appointment with him as soon as

possible for thurs after class ...

I think we should submit the Deliverable B as a final document as he is

goingto grade for the 19 points of deliverable B on the basis of what we

will submit him now and not on the portion of the deliverable B taht we will

submit with the final deliverable C ....so we should pay especial attention

on that that everyhing is matching with other...Danny thinks that structured

chart is irrelevant and we should not submit and also the state diagram what

we need is only a curd matrix....we can also reconfirm taht with him through

email...

Adam if u receive this mail just send me an acknowledgement that u have

received it.

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: Blue Sedge <[email protected]>

Reply-To: [email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

CC: [email protected]

Subject: [Fwd: Wrapping up Deliverable B.- With Attachment

Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 20:43:32 -0500

CRUD Matrix - rough copy is attached. I will work on it.

<< message3.txt >>

<< 051599CRUD.xls >>

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

I did get this message - so should we meet with him after class on Thurs? Is that OK with everyone? Then can we meet on Sat. to finish everything up and make sure things match?

I will work on the CRUD Matrix early this week and send it to all of you.

Zeeshan - please confirm that Danny said that we Do Not need to include a State Diagram.

Thanks,

Adam

Hi all

Adam I had send a detailed email regarding the Sat meeting with

DAnny......again his greater empahsis was on that everything is balance and

syncroniized with each other.....I emailed u guys his comments regarding the

DFD and I think we should set a meeting appointment with him as soon as

possible for thurs after class ...

I think we should submit the Deliverable B as a final document as he is

goingto grade for the 19 points of deliverable B on the basis of what we

will submit him now and not on the portion of the deliverable B taht we will

submit with the final deliverable C ....so we should pay especial attention

on that that everyhing is matching with other...Danny thinks that structured

chart is irrelevant and we should not submit and also the state diagram what

we need is only a curd matrix....we can also reconfirm taht with him through

email...

Adam if u receive this mail just send me an acknowledgement that u have

received it.

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: Blue Sedge <[email protected]>

Reply-To: [email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

CC: [email protected]

Subject: [Fwd: Wrapping up Deliverable B.- With Attachment

Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 20:43:32 -0500

CRUD Matrix - rough copy is attached. I will work on it.

<< message3.txt >>

<< 051599CRUD.xls >>

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

HI,

Yes Danny said that we dont need a state diagram for our project ....

but we should confirm that with him by email.

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

Subject: Re: [Fwd: Wrapping up Deliverable B.- With Attachment

Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 17:55:48 -0600

I did get this message - so should we meet with him after class on Thurs?

Is

that OK with everyone? Then can we meet on Sat. to finish everything up and

make sure things match?

I will work on the CRUD Matrix early this week and send it to all of you.

Zeeshan - please confirm that Danny said that we Do Not need to include a

State

Diagram.

Thanks,

Adam

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

cc: Adam Oxer

Date: 05/16/99 09:26 PM

From: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [Fwd: Wrapping up Deliverable B.- With Attachment

Hi all

Adam I had send a detailed email regarding the Sat meeting with

DAnny......again his greater empahsis was on that everything is balance and

syncroniized with each other.....I emailed u guys his comments regarding the

DFD and I think we should set a meeting appointment with him as soon as

possible for thurs after class ...

I think we should submit the Deliverable B as a final document as he is

goingto grade for the 19 points of deliverable B on the basis of what we

will submit him now and not on the portion of the deliverable B taht we will

submit with the final deliverable C ....so we should pay especial attention

on that that everyhing is matching with other...Danny thinks that structured

chart is irrelevant and we should not submit and also the state diagram what

we need is only a curd matrix....we can also reconfirm taht with him through

email...

Adam if u receive this mail just send me an acknowledgement that u have

received it.

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: Blue Sedge <[email protected]>

Reply-To: [email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

CC: [email protected]

Subject: [Fwd: Wrapping up Deliverable B.- With Attachment

Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 20:43:32 -0500

CRUD Matrix - rough copy is attached. I will work on it.

<< message3.txt >>

<< 051599CRUD.xls >>

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery

of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

Hi all,

Here are my firts two pieces which are

- Entity Relationship Diagram (erdsupport1.doc)

- Database Schema (schemasupport1.doc) and

- Data dictionary (ddlsupport1.doc)

Julio

_____________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com

[erdsupport1.doc]

[schemasupport1.doc]

[ddlsupport1.doc]

Hi all,

Here is the final version of the support1 database in access.

Julio

_____________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com

[support1.mdb]

Hey guys, I've been thinking about the table attributes for assigned request

and I was thinking that maybe we should shift these items to that table

because they really don't play a role in the request till after the request

has been assigned.

And they are:

Priority_id

Employee_ID

Request Status

Resolution_des

Closed_date...

Mind you, I am not an expert, but I think that it makes more sense to have

that data in the assigned_request table...

Let me know what you think...

Juan C. Casillas

Plant Operations Maintenance/Emergency Preparedness

ComEd Information Services 8th Floor

(312) 394-7629, (461)x7629, FAX(312) 394-4405

[email protected]

-----Original Message-----

From: Julio Salazar [SMTP:[email protected]]

Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 7:10 PM

To: Zeeshan Khan

Cc: Juan Casillas; Sophia Clay; Adam Oxer; Julio A Salazar

Subject: Database in access

Hi all,

Here is the final version of the support1 database in access.

Julio

_____________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com <<

File: support1.mdb >>

Hello all,

I am just getting access to mail today, as i have moved to a new

location and my email address has been switch

to a new server. So, I have a lot a mail to go through hope to get to them

all by end of day to day. If there's something

urgent i need to be aware of right away please send message "urgent".

Sophia

312-954-5238

p.s. EMAIL address still the same.

"zeeshan khan" <[email protected]> on 05/14/99 08:54:52 PM

To: [email protected], [email protected], Sophia

Clay/IL/CDN@CDN, [email protected]

cc:

Subject: Re: Our Meeting before the meeting w/ Danny: Sat. AM Meeting

9:00am@ Starbucks ( Jackson & Wabash) - Please confirm

Hi All,

since danny will not be able to meet us before 12.30 do u guys still want

to

meet at 9 tomorrow ....I think we should meet a bit late by 11am or so

....I

dont think we need a six hour meeting

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

Subject: Our Meeting before the meeting w/ Danny: Sat. AM Meeting 9:00am@

Starbucks ( Jackson & Wabash) - Please confirm

Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 08:08:32 -0600

This note is mostly for Sophia - We talked meeting at 9:00 am on Sat - to

talk

about the project before we meet with Danny at 9:30. Danny said in class

that a

9:30 meeting was OK. He just wanted a confirmation by E-mail.

Is meeting at 9:00am OK with all of you? Also at Starbucks

Thanks,

Adam

---------------------- Forwarded by Adam Oxer on 05/14/99 08:04 AM

---------------------------

To: [email protected]

cc: [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected],

[email protected]

Date: 05/14/99 08:00 AM

From: Adam Oxer, Chicago.225N, 50 / 70-ATS

Subject: Sat. AM Meeting 9:30am@ Starbucks ( Jackson & Wabash) - Please

confirm

We talked about meeting with our team ( SupportP1 - Software changes for

Peoplesoft projects) Tomorrow, Sat. 5/15. Can we meet at 9:30 at Starbucks

on

Jackson and Wabash? We'd like about 30 - 40 minutes of your time.

Thanks,

Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery

of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

Zeeshan i didn't say we need to do structure charts i said we need to

do one or the other; The last 422 class i attended, danny said we had to do

a structure chart or state diagram. Again i doesn't matter to me which

we do.

Sophia

"zeeshan khan" <[email protected]> on 05/16/99 12:57:19 AM

To: [email protected], [email protected], Sophia

Clay/IL/CDN@CDN, [email protected]

cc:

Subject: meeting w/ Danny:

Hi All,

I met Danny on sat at 1.30pm and show him the DFD and structured chart that

I and Adam had done .....he said the same thing, Adam that since in our

project processes are not dependent on each other we dont need a structured

chart and state diagram what we need is the CRUD matrix which we already

have made....but I talk to Sophia and she thinks otherwise so we have to

decide among overselves that we want to put it in our not Danny said that

if

it is not meaningful to the project then dont put it in.

About DFD he said that we need to have a level 2 for that. he said that we

should show maintain process maintain employee,maintain priority and

maintain department as something like a single process on level 1 of DFD

and

then break it up inthe level2 for details...I think he dont like the idea

of

having 3 pages for level1 of DFD he wants o have level one of DFD on 1 page

so according to him this will give us some space to put everything on one

page...

he also wants to create a level 2 for generate report process particularly

when in technical lead we are submitting 2 reports.

he sais thah he is ok with our ERD but I am not sure which one he was

talking about as we have not show him the latest one ...

I asked him about a meeting appointment after class on thursday so that we

can show him the deliverable B before submission and wants us to make an

appointment thru email...I think we should do that fast before anyone else

pick up the slot....

My understanding is that deliverable B is worth 19 points and we will be

graded on the basis of deliverable B for that 19 points not on the part of

the deliverable B that we will submit with final version so we should take

especial care for the mistakes and dont postpone it for until for the final

submission of the report as deliverable C

I have updated the web site I put some bright orange color in the back

ground let me know about your opinions on that and also what else u want to

put on the web site.

I talked to him about the report part which is due for me he said that he

is

only interested in the text format and does not require codes and interface

for the report generations...but I will reconfirm with him again .....

let me know what u guys think about structured chart

rest of the things look fine.

Zeeshan

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

1. Is Everyone Available for a meeting with Danny after class today? I can send him a Note this morning. Let me know each of you are available. We can just ask him if everything that we have looks good to this point.

2.

I think:

Priority_id

and

Employee_ID

Should be in the Assigned_Request;

I think Request Status, Resolution_Des and Closed_date are related more to the request, than assigned request. To me, these are items that that are related to the opening and closing of the request, not the assignment of the request.

What do all of you think?

Adam

Hey guys, I've been thinking about the table attributes for assigned request

and I was thinking that maybe we should shift these items to that table

because they really don't play a role in the request till after the request

has been assigned.

And they are:

Priority_id

Employee_ID

Request Status

Resolution_des

Closed_date...

Mind you, I am not an expert, but I think that it makes more sense to have

that data in the assigned_request table...

Let me know what you think...

Juan C. Casillas

Plant Operations Maintenance/Emergency Preparedness

ComEd Information Services 8th Floor

(312) 394-7629, (461)x7629, FAX(312) 394-4405

[email protected]

-----Original Message-----

From: Julio Salazar [SMTP:[email protected]]

Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 7:10 PM

To: Zeeshan Khan

Cc: Juan Casillas; Sophia Clay; Adam Oxer; Julio A Salazar

Subject: Database in access

Hi all,

Here is the final version of the support1 database in access.

Julio

_____________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com <<

File: support1.mdb >>

Yeah, that will work for me.

Juan C. Casillas

Plant Operations Maintenance/Emergency Preparedness

ComEd Information Services 8th Floor

(312) 394-7629, (461)x7629, FAX(312) 394-4405

[email protected]

-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected]

[SMTP:[email protected]]

Sent: Thursday, May 20, 1999 6:53 AM

To: [email protected]

Cc: sophia_clay; [email protected]

Subject: RE: Database in access

1. Is Everyone Available for a meeting with Danny after class

today? I can

send him a Note this morning. Let me know each of you are

available. We can

just ask him if everything that we have looks good to this point.

2.

I think:

Priority_id

and

Employee_ID

Should be in the Assigned_Request;

I think Request Status, Resolution_Des and Closed_date are related

more to the

request, than assigned request. To me, these are items that that

are related to

the opening and closing of the request, not the assignment of the

request.

What do all of you think?

Adam

To: [email protected], [email protected]

cc: [email protected], [email protected], Adam Oxer

Date: 05/18/99 07:58 AM

From: [email protected]

Subject: RE: Database in access

Hey guys, I've been thinking about the table attributes for assigned

request

and I was thinking that maybe we should shift these items to that

table

because they really don't play a role in the request till after the

request

has been assigned.

And they are:

Priority_id

Employee_ID

Request Status

Resolution_des

Closed_date...

Mind you, I am not an expert, but I think that it makes more sense

to have

that data in the assigned_request table...

Let me know what you think...

Juan C. Casillas

Plant Operations Maintenance/Emergency Preparedness

ComEd Information Services 8th Floor

(312) 394-7629, (461)x7629, FAX(312) 394-4405

[email protected]

-----Original Message-----

From: Julio Salazar [SMTP:[email protected]]

Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 7:10 PM

To: Zeeshan Khan

Cc: Juan Casillas; Sophia Clay; Adam Oxer; Julio A Salazar

Subject: Database in access

Hi all,

Here is the final version of the support1 database in access.

Julio

_____________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com

<<

File: support1.mdb >>

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality

Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this

message. If you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for

delivery of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this

message to anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the

sender by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does

not consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions

and other

information in this message that do not relate to the official

business of my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

I didn't get everyone ths email this morning

1. Is Everyone Available for a meeting with Danny after class today? I can send him a Note this morning. Let me know each of you are available. We can just ask him if everything that we have looks good to this point.

2.

I think:

Priority_id

and

Employee_ID

Should be in the Assigned_Request;

I think Request Status, Resolution_Des and Closed_date are related more to the request, than assigned request. To me, these are items that that are related to the opening and closing of the request, not the assignment of the request.

What do all of you think?

Adam

Hey guys, I've been thinking about the table attributes for assigned request

and I was thinking that maybe we should shift these items to that table

because they really don't play a role in the request till after the request

has been assigned.

And they are:

Priority_id

Employee_ID

Request Status

Resolution_des

Closed_date...

Mind you, I am not an expert, but I think that it makes more sense to have

that data in the assigned_request table...

Let me know what you think...

Juan C. Casillas

Plant Operations Maintenance/Emergency Preparedness

ComEd Information Services 8th Floor

(312) 394-7629, (461)x7629, FAX(312) 394-4405

[email protected]

-----Original Message-----

From: Julio Salazar [SMTP:[email protected]]

Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 7:10 PM

To: Zeeshan Khan

Cc: Juan Casillas; Sophia Clay; Adam Oxer; Julio A Salazar

Subject: Database in access

Hi all,

Here is the final version of the support1 database in access.

Julio

_____________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com <<

File: support1.mdb >>

Please let me know if we can meet with you after class today ( 5/20/99) -(For the Support P1 project). I sent you an e-mail a few weeks ago asking about a tentative meeting before class (at 5:15). But we would prefer after class.

Thanks,

Adam

Here's the CRUD Matrix: I just sent Danny a note asking about meeting him after class. I'm sorry I didn't send it sooner. Work has been nutty this week.

Based on the notes that have gone back and forth, it looks like we have everything that we need for deliverable B. Maybe there are a few things to discuss still. ( Juan's point about moving the attributes)

Does anyone know of anything that we are missing? If so, let's talk about it in class.

I will print out each piece of deliverable B and we can look at them all together in class. We can make sure that they "all balance with eachother."

When should we plan to meet this weekend? Sat? Let's talk about it in class.

Thanks,

Adam

[052099 crud.xls]

At 12:54 PM 5/20/1999 , [email protected] wrote:

>

>

>Please let me know if we can meet with you after class today ( 5/20/99) -(For

>the Support P1 project). I sent you an e-mail a few weeks ago asking about a

>tentative meeting before class (at 5:15). But we would prefer after class.

Let me do a reply all instead of just to Adam...

After class tonight is fine.

d

______________________________

Daniel Mittleman

DePaul University

http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

Mostly to let Sophia Know - We arranged a meeting for the 5 of us for Sat. Morning:

We will start on the 11th Floor. Then we will go to a Library Conference Room. By 10:00 we will go to the lab at the CTI Building (Above McDonalds) to work on the Access software in the lab.

We talked to Danny After Class - He told us some more of the issue that we need to change for deliverable B - But we are pretty close to done.

Sophia - He asked us to change the Data Flow Diagram to try to put it all on one page ( He gave us suggestions for consolidating the Maintain processes into 1 process. We need you to edit this. If you cannot make it to the meeting on Sat ( We really could use you there), can you send the Visio Files for the Data Flow Diagrams to Zeeshan? - Thanks.

See all of you tomorrow morning,

Adam

Hi,

Can you bring the windows 98 CD with MSproject with you tomorrow I will

appreciate it. see u all there at 9am.

Thanks

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

Subject: Meeting at 9:00 AM Sat. 5/22 - 11th Floor - DePaul Center.

Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 12:06:45 -0600

Mostly to let Sophia Know - We arranged a meeting for the 5 of us for Sat.

Morning:

9:00 AM Sat. 5/22 - 11th Floor - DePaul Center.

We will start on the 11th Floor. Then we will go to a Library Conference

Room.

By 10:00 we will go to the lab at the CTI Building (Above McDonalds) to work

on

the Access software in the lab.

We talked to Danny After Class - He told us some more of the issue that we

need

to change for deliverable B - But we are pretty close to done.

Sophia - He asked us to change the Data Flow Diagram to try to put it all on

one

page ( He gave us suggestions for consolidating the Maintain processes into

1

process. We need you to edit this. If you cannot make it to the meeting on

Sat

( We really could use you there), can you send the Visio Files for the Data

Flow

Diagrams to Zeeshan? - Thanks.

See all of you tomorrow morning,

Adam

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery

of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

Hi Adam,

I have put my three pieces togheter in a word document

1.- ER Diagram (I made a copy in your floppy disk. I didn't change

anything, so it is the same version either in your floppy disk or in

this document).

2.- Database Schema

3.- Data Dictionary

The other file is the latest version of the Database in access.

Besides, I left a floppy disk which contains the above documents with

Zeeshan.

If you need something else let me know.

Thanks

Julio

_____________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com

[support1.mdb]

[schema dll and erd toghether.doc]

Hi AdAM

I am attaching Level 2 DFD with narations.

Thanks

Zeeshan

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

[naration.doc]

(See attached file: dfd.vsd)(See attached file: Dfd.doc)

[dfd.vsd]

[dfd.doc]

This is the final version of our Deliverable B that we sent to Danny.

Zeeshan and I worked on getting this document out the door this

afternoon and evening. The problem was that we were having trouble

getting the revised Level 1 Data Flow Diagram done and into the Word

document. Therefore, I sent one version to Danny at 11:59pm and this

version at about 12:25 am. As you can see I asked him to take this

version. It has a cleaner Level 1 DFD.

I will send the 11:59 version so you can all see that as well.

I'm glad we have this deliverable "off our plate." It is definitely

"Crunch Time" to get this done by the end of the term. I'm going to

start doing the "end-user help" on the most current database ( from

Julio, 5/22 1:12pm email). We need to be working on only one version,

so I think we need to schedule days that we are working on the .mdb

file.

Thanks,

Adam

Message-ID: <[email protected]>

Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 00:24:25 -0500

From: Blue Sedge <[email protected]>

Reply-To: [email protected]

Organization: Blue Sedge

X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-IDT-v5 (Win95; U)

MIME-Version: 1.0

To: [email protected]

Subject: Deliverable B - Request for acceptance of the attached version.

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------1802357287F"

Danny -

We were having trouble getting our revised Data Flow Diagram - Level 1

into our document. If possible, please accept this version of our

Deliverable B instead of the one sent at 11:59 ( about 25 min. ago).

The difference is in the data flow diagram for Level 1.

Thanks,

Adam

Once again, please confirm that you received this at my work e-mail

address ([email protected])

[supportp1 proj deliv b 052399 final.doc]

Here's the version that I sent at 11:59 pm.

Adam

Message-ID: <[email protected]>

Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 23:59:06 -0500

From: Blue Sedge <[email protected]>

Reply-To: [email protected]

Organization: Blue Sedge

X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-IDT-v5 (Win95; U)

MIME-Version: 1.0

To: [email protected]

Subject: From Adam Oxer - Support P1 Deliv. B

Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------5CE12741146E"

Here is the Deliverable B for our group.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Adam

(Please confirm that you received this -

[email protected])

[supportp1 deliv b 052399 final.doc]

Hi Adam, I was wondering if you can E-mail me the latest Access database

that we have?

Juan C. Casillas

Plant Operations Maintenance/Emergency Preparedness

ComEd Information Services 8th Floor

(312) 394-7629, (461)x7629, FAX(312) 394-4405

[email protected]

-----Original Message-----

From: [email protected]

[SMTP:[email protected]]

Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 12:43 PM

To: [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]; [email protected]

Subject: A few issues

This is our most current version of the Database.

These are the thing that we need to do by 6/10:

Reports: Zeeshan

Main Menu Screen: Juan

Connecting the Forms to the Tables: Juan

Help Menus: Adam

Make Test Data: Adam

Testing: Adam

Preparing our 20 Min Presentation: Everyone ( We're 4th in line on 6/10)

We talked about meeting on Sat. 6/5, to prepare for the presentation and wrap up the prototype. Is this fine for everyone?

I will assume that everyone will be studying for the Exam ( Including me) until 6/3, so we will not think too much about the project. If you do make changes to this database, please send a copy to everyone, so we have a current version we can all work off of.

See the attachment of the database below.

Have a good Holiday Weekend ( STUDYING!! %#$&%!!)

Thanks,

Adam

[Revised suppport1 from 052899.mdb]

Here is the email I received from Danny. I guess that we will have to

talk about this on our 6/5 meeting. Probably not before (at least in

person).

I will send him a note asking if he would like to see a revised DFD in

the presentation ( although he said that he wasn't looking for that ).

Also if we will be get points taken off if we change the CRUD Matrix and

Input screens.

I hope you holiday weekend was good.

Take care,

Adam

***********************************************************

Subject:

Re: From Adam Oxer - Support P1 Deliv. B

Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 18:52:35 -0500

From: Daniel Mittleman <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

I spent some time yesterday with your project and then went back to it

today to make sure each project had two passes of review.

While it is clear you have put considerable effort into the project and

the

project is coming along well all in all, there are several technical

errors

you should note:

1. Your context DFD is illegal. You can't have flows from external

entity

to external entity. If the flows don't go through your system, they

aren't

part of your system. This error carries over to level 1. My hunch, but

I

am not sure, is that this problem stems from the fact that you have

defined

the technical lead as being outside the system when actually he is

inside

the system.

2. Your level 2 DFD for Process 4 is not balanced to level 1. In level

one

you show a flow in from the technical lead, but you don't show it in

level

2. Again, the problem may stem from how your view the technical leads

position outside the system.

3. Similar problems with Process 6 as you don't show the technical lead

entity again. Also I note that both level 2 DFDs are incorrectly

structured almost as trees from the level 1. They don't depict flows,

if

any exist, among the sub-processes. And they do incorrectly depict

flows

that cross from level 2 to level 1.

Did your other level one processes not decompose?

Other than these comments the DFDs look good. The ERD is fine.

4. First thing I notice about the first screen shown is that while it

has

lots of wasted gray space, the form is larger than the screen requiring

use

of a scrollbar. Isn't it possible to eliminate some gray and fit all

the

data on one screen? Otherwise, the screens do look good.

5. On your CRUD analysis, you don't allow for the ability to delete a

request or an assignment. Is this what your business policy is? I note

that you do allow for deleting an employee. What happens if you assign

a

request to an employee who later gets deleted? You don't have a process

that can either update or delete the assignment so the assignment stays

with the deleted employee forever?

Your grade on deliverable B is B. I hope this isn't too disheartening

for

you. This is less than 20% of your course grade, but as much as I like

aspect of the project I can't see giving it a higher grade with

technical

mistakes in it.

I am looking forward to seeing your presentation.

dm

______________________________

Daniel Mittleman

DePaul University

http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

Thank you for giving us feedback on our project.

I have questions about the items that you mentioned that were lacking in

our Deliverable B. Are we allowed to modify these for our Deliverable

C? The three issues are as follows:

1. Our DFDs need need more work.

2. Our screens could use design improvements.

3. Our CRUD Matrix conflicts with itself.

If our presentation does not include a DFD or CRUD Matrix (because we

are appealing to upper-management in our presention), is there any way

to include revisions of these in Deliverable C and get graded on it or

is this just 'water under the bridge' for us?

If we revised our screens, would we get points taken off of Deliverable

C because we changed the design after our Deliverable B (May 23) 'Design

Freeze'?

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Adam

Daniel Mittleman wrote:

>

> I spent some time yesterday with your project and then went back to it

> today to make sure each project had two passes of review.

>

> While it is clear you have put considerable effort into the project and the

> project is coming along well all in all, there are several technical errors

> you should note:

>

> 1. Your context DFD is illegal. You can't have flows from external entity

> to external entity. If the flows don't go through your system, they aren't

> part of your system. This error carries over to level 1. My hunch, but I

> am not sure, is that this problem stems from the fact that you have defined

> the technical lead as being outside the system when actually he is inside

> the system.

>

> 2. Your level 2 DFD for Process 4 is not balanced to level 1. In level one

> you show a flow in from the technical lead, but you don't show it in level

> 2. Again, the problem may stem from how your view the technical leads

> position outside the system.

>

> 3. Similar problems with Process 6 as you don't show the technical lead

> entity again. Also I note that both level 2 DFDs are incorrectly

> structured almost as trees from the level 1. They don't depict flows, if

> any exist, among the sub-processes. And they do incorrectly depict flows

> that cross from level 2 to level 1.

>

> Did your other level one processes not decompose?

>

> Other than these comments the DFDs look good. The ERD is fine.

>

> 4. First thing I notice about the first screen shown is that while it has

> lots of wasted gray space, the form is larger than the screen requiring use

> of a scrollbar. Isn't it possible to eliminate some gray and fit all the

> data on one screen? Otherwise, the screens do look good.

>

> 5. On your CRUD analysis, you don't allow for the ability to delete a

> request or an assignment. Is this what your business policy is? I note

> that you do allow for deleting an employee. What happens if you assign a

> request to an employee who later gets deleted? You don't have a process

> that can either update or delete the assignment so the assignment stays

> with the deleted employee forever?

>

> Your grade on deliverable B is B. I hope this isn't too disheartening for

> you. This is less than 20% of your course grade, but as much as I like

> aspect of the project I can't see giving it a higher grade with technical

> mistakes in it.

>

> I am looking forward to seeing your presentation.

>

> dm

>

> ______________________________

> Daniel Mittleman

> DePaul University

> http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

Here's the CRUD Analysis:

[052099 CRUD.xls]

From Danny:

Received: by u2.farm.idt.net for blsedge (with pop daemon (v1.21 1997/08/10) Wed Jun 2 02:35:25 1999)

X-From_: [email protected] Tue Jun 1 12:49:46 1999

Received: from mail-relay4.idt.net (MAIL-RELAY4.IDT.NET [169.132.8.88]) by u1.farm.idt.net (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA02726 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 12:49:45 -0400 (EDT)

Received: from bach.cs.depaul.edu (bach.cs.depaul.edu [140.192.33.6]) by mail-relay4.idt.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA12920 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 12:51:07 -0400 (EDT)

Received: from mies (mies.cs.depaul.edu [140.192.32.94]) by bach.cs.depaul.edu with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2524.0) id L4A3A1XN; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 11:49:30 -0500

Message-Id: <[email protected]>

X-Sender: [email protected]

X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1

Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 11:45:40 -0500

To: [email protected]

From: Daniel Mittleman <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: Questions about Project - Support P1 Deliv. B and Deliv. C

In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

References: <[email protected]>

Mime-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 08:03 PM 5/31/1999 , you wrote:

>Thank you for giving us feedback on our project.

>

>I have questions about the items that you mentioned that were lacking in

>our Deliverable B. Are we allowed to modify these for our Deliverable

>C? The three issues are as follows:

>

>1. Our DFDs need need more work.

>

>2. Our screens could use design improvements.

>

>3. Our CRUD Matrix conflicts with itself.

>

>If our presentation does not include a DFD or CRUD Matrix (because we

>are appealing to upper-management in our presention), is there any way

>to include revisions of these in Deliverable C and get graded on it or

>is this just 'water under the bridge' for us?

>

>If we revised our screens, would we get points taken off of Deliverable

>C because we changed the design after our Deliverable B (May 23) 'Design

>Freeze'?

You definitely should fix screens. I won't take off for improvements

between B and C.

You may revise the other deliverables, however expect that your final grade

on Deliverable B will be an amalgam of what you already turned in plus what

you modify it to be.

______________________________

Daniel Mittleman

DePaul University

http://mies.cs.depaul.edu/danny/

Zeeshan and I talked after the exam last night ( I'm glad that exam is over). We thought that 10:00 am at the computer lab would be good for our last Sat. Meeting. Is that OK with everyone? We need to discuss the presentation and wrap up the actual Access Database. This is it. Next Thursday we are done! Then we just saddle up our horses and ride into the sunset. ( What am I talking about?).

Take care,

Adam

Adam,

10 am Saturday @ CTI building is fine with me. I'll see you there

Julio

--- [email protected] wrote:

>

>

> Zeeshan and I talked after the exam last night ( I'm

> glad that exam is over).

> We thought that 10:00 am at the computer lab would

> be good for our last Sat.

> Meeting. Is that OK with everyone? We need to

> discuss the presentation and

> wrap up the actual Access Database. This is it.

> Next Thursday we are done!

> Then we just saddle up our horses and ride into the

> sunset. ( What am I talking

> about?).

>

> Take care,

>

> Adam

>

> *******************Internet Email Confidentiality

> Footer*******************

>

>

> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained

> in this message. If you

> are not the addressee indicated in this message (or

> responsible for delivery of

> the message to such person), you may not copy or

> deliver this message to anyone.

> In such case, you should destroy this message and

> kindly notify the sender by

> reply email. Please advise immediately if you or

> your employer does not consent

> to Internet email for messages of this kind.

> Opinions, conclusions and other

> information in this message that do not relate to

> the official business of my

> firm shall be understood as neither given nor

> endorsed by it.

>

>

>

_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Ok, guys here is some what of a final product.

I still can't figure out the login with the appropriate rights thing.

i created a global/ public variable

and tried some code, but it seems to work differently the the standard VB

i know. If anyone know how to do it. Let me know, a really need some

help here.

Adam, I alot of the help stuff you put in has been erased.

can you add that on again. If you can't i will do it, but i won't get to

it till after Tuesday evening.

Ok.

well later..

[test1.mdb]

Hey guys, forget my last note.

I figured out the problem.

It workes now. I will e-mail you guys the final product later tonight.

Okay guys, this is good.

the system is done.

The login IDs are: "Tech" and "TechLead"

Tech only has access to "status" and "Description" fieds.

ThechLead has access to everything that he needs to manipulate.

there is also a visitors pass.

If you leave the "login" empty...you then are then entering as a "visitor"

As a visitor you only have access to view the main form.

Test it out.

[test1.mdb]

Hey Adam'

can u email me the deliverables that I asked u so that I can poat them on

web ...I still have not figure out my access problem

Zeeshan

----Original Message Follows----

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],

[email protected]

Subject: 5/28/99 Current Database Version

Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 13:43:14 -0600

This is our most current version of the Database.

These are the thing that we need to do by 6/10:

Reports: Zeeshan

Main Menu Screen: Juan

Connecting the Forms to the Tables: Juan

Help Menus: Adam

Make Test Data: Adam

Testing: Adam

Preparing our 20 Min Presentation: Everyone ( We're 4th in line on 6/10)

We talked about meeting on Sat. 6/5, to prepare for the presentation and

wrap up

the prototype. Is this fine for everyone?

I will assume that everyone will be studying for the Exam ( Including me)

until

6/3, so we will not think too much about the project. If you do make

changes to

this database, please send a copy to everyone, so we have a current version

we

can all work off of.

See the attachment of the database below.

Have a good Holiday Weekend ( STUDYING!! %#$&%!!)

Thanks,

Adam

(See attached file: Revised support1 from 052899.mdb)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If

you

are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery

of

the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to

anyone.

In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender

by

reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not

consent

to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and

other

information in this message that do not relate to the official business of

my

firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

<< Revisedsupport1from052899.mdb >>

_______________________________________________________________

Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com